Ever since
the leaders of India and Japan signed the deal to launch a high-speed rail (more
commonly called Bullet Train) project connecting Mumbai and Ahmedabad, as with
any governmental announcement, there is a lot of pro and against news on the subject.
Though a bullet train has been the object of our fascination for decades, no
government has even attempted to even try to launch one. Now that this project
is launched and conflicting news shared by different groups, I thought it would
be a good idea to share my views on the topic…
Before we
Begin: This is not a politically motivated article. The views in this article
are those of the authors and are not endorsed or sponsored by any group/party. Kindly
refrain from posting offensive comments if you happen to disagree with the
contents of the article. Such comments will not be published.
What is in
this article?
This
article simply evaluates the financial aspects of the project to see if it
makes financial sense & viability for India to embark on such a massive
investment. Naysayers have also highlighted things like the route was chosen
for political mileage or that some other city connection should’ve been prioritized
etc. Such points have been intentionally excluded. Of course this is the
starting point of a much larger collaboration between India and Japan with
potential for cooperation in many other areas including defense. So, taking
this project as a standalone evaluation is not fair but unfortunately when we
evaluate a project for financial viability, we cannot predict what will happen
20 years from now. So, we go with what we know.
Specifics
of the Project:
The cities Mumbai
Ahmedabad will be connected by a high-speed bullet train which will cover the
distance in less than 3 hours reaching speeds of over 300 km per hour. The
project will be built using Japanese technology and 85% of the proposed 1.1
lakh crore investment is funded by Japan at a 0.1% rate of interest loan
repayable over 50 years. The project is scheduled to complete by the year 2023
and is expected to carry around 750 passengers per trip which will get
increased to around 1200 after a few years. Every day around 35 round trips (70
trips) are expected in the initial few years which would get increased to
around 100 trips per day.
0.1% on a loan
That sounds almost free – isn’t it?
On paper
yes. In a country where home loans are going at around 8-9% interest rate, a
0.1% rate of interest sounds pretty much non-existent. But, what we are
ignoring is the purchasing power of the indian rupee against the Japanese Yen
plus the fact that the loan has to be repaid in Yen not rupees. Inflation in
Japan is very low (less than 1%) while our inflation is around 5-6% now. So,
over the next 50 years, even though the interest rate is 0.1%, we need to
factor-in inflation and the purchasing power of the rupee.
Even if we
assume that inflation in India will average at around 3-4%, that means the
rupees purchasing power will be down by 100% in roughly 30 years and
potentially over 150% by the end of the loan tenure of 50 years. This means, on
a loan of 88,000 crore rupees, when being repaid in Yen, will go up to approx. 1,50,000
crores by around the 20-25 year loan tenure mark. If we take the full 50 years
to repay the loan, we are potentially looking at a much larger number.
Now, go
back and assess if the 0.1% loan interest is still attractive…
Financial
Viability of the Project
Now that we
have evaluated that the loan isn’t as cheap as it sounds on paper, lets look at
purely the financial viability of the project. The government is investing 1.1
lakh crores on this bullet train line. Lets try to calculate the potential
price of a ticket with a few simple assumptions.
- The government will aim to recover the investment in 50 years
- We will go with a Government of India study from 2014 which predicts a cost of 412 crores per year to operate and maintain the bullet train line between the two cities
- We will assume the train will carry an average of around 1000 passengers per trip and make 100 trips in a day (and all seats will be filled)
1.1 lakh
crores to be recovered in 50 years means, the train has to raise a revenue of
2200 crores every year which translates to 183 crores in a month and roughly
6.1 crores a day. Assuming 100 trips and 1000 passengers per trip, the figure
works out to around Rs. 610/- per passenger. That doesn’t sound like a big
ticket price right?
A study
conducted by the Indian government in 2014 estimated that maintenance and
operations of the bullet train track between Mumbai and Ahmedabad will cost
around 412 crores per year. If we factor in this cost, the ticket price will go
up to Rs. 725 per passenger.
However,
the cost of 412 crores is from 2014 and by the time the track is operational in
2023, the cost is expected to go up significantly because of Inflation. If we
take that into consideration, a price of approx. 1000 rupees per ticket seems
more realistic.
This 1000
rupees per ticket is just to recover the initial investment. If we want the
rail line to earn an income for the government at least enough to repay the
loan, this number is bound to go up even more and if the government wants to
earn a revenue on top of the loan amount, we are looking at an even higher
figure for ticket price.
So, I think
the project does not make much financial sense. Will explain why in the next
section…
Why this
project doesn’t make Financial Sense?
Let me
start by asking you this question: Do you think that residents of Mumbai or
Ahmedabad can afford a few thousand rupees on a train ticket? Or rather, I should
rephrase the question – would residents of Mumbai or Ahmedabad be willing to
spend a few thousand rupees on a bullet train ticket when a regular train that
only takes an extra 4-5 hours at potentially 20% of the cost?
The initial
few months/years, the eagerness to travel by a high-speed bullet train will
make people want to spend the extra money but as time goes by, the euphoria
will be replaced by reality and as with any human being, unless saving those 5
hours is ultra crucial, I would prefer to spend 80% less money and use the
regular train instead.
A real life
example from our
Sri Lanka
as we all know has been investing tremendously in infrastructure projects over
the last decade of course with massive funding’s from the Chinese. A simple
example was their ambitious attempt to build a world class airport Mattala
Rajapaksa International Airport, the second largest in Sri Lanka at an
investment of $209 million as a loan from the Chinese. This project is generating a revenue of $300,000
per year but they have to repay $23.6 million per year to the Chinese for the
next 8 years for the loan they offered to actually build the airport.
The Lankans also invested $1.1 billion to build a deep water port at Hambantota along with a
four lane expressway connecting the city with neighboring cities all with loans
from the Chinese. With the port not attracting as many ships as was originally
planned and the expressway attracting more elephants than trucks, both projects
have generated little to no revenue for the country.
With a
burgeoning debt to the Chinese, the government of Sri Lanka has agreed to give
70% equity stake in the port over 99 years in exchange for writing off $1.1
billion in loan and a further loan of $600 million to make the port commercially
viable.
This port and the airport are a classic example of wanting to build something spectacular without
calculating the financial viability of the project and then ending up in deep
debt while trying to borrow more money to make the project commercially viable.
Am worried that we are embarking on a journey of similar fate with the bullet
train.
Some last
words:
We are
potentially embarking on a venture that is going to increase our national debt
that needs to be repaid by future generations by massive proportions. Am worried
that we are doing an injustice to them by incurring such humongous loans.
Hope the government
has a plan to make this a successful project and not fall into an endless debt
trap with the Japanese.
