Its been
almost a year since the Demonetisation announcement by the Indian prime
minister but the argument has actually not subsided on whether it was a success
or a failure. The pro BJP faction is sharing statistics to justify the decision
and glorify the outcome while the anti BJP faction is doing just the opposite. To
add on, experts from many different walks of the world have shared their
opinion which sadly too has been corrupted by the biased narrative.
So, the
common man is confused – was this a success or a failure? That is what I am
hoping to help you understand by the end of this article.
Why this
article?
Ever since
our GDP Growth slowdown news came out, people have been quick to blame
Demonetization. I wrote an article a few days back explaining the reason why
our GDP is slowing down. But, since people are blaming Demonetization, the BJP
Supporters have retaliated by sharing news/statistics on how it was needed or
useful. A good friend of mine sent me the list and wanted me to comment whether
they are true or not. So, I thought why not write an article since its going to
be a lengthy response… Here we go.
How this
article is structured
I will be
listing down all those demonetization was successful because arguments one by one and adding my
opinion on whether it is True or not.
Before we
begin: This is not a politically motivated article. The views in this article
are entirely the authors and are not a representation of any group or faction. If
you disagree with the views expressed in this article, kindly refrain from
posting derogatory or abusive comments. Such comments WILL NOT be published.
Argument 1:
It was done to catch Black Money and was a success – Partially True
This was of
course the major reason that was cited when this drastic decision was
announced. Yes, any transaction in cash cannot be tracked by the tax-man
(unless the shopkeeper actually gives a receipt and declares the income) and
with lax enforcement by corrupt officials, the shadow cash economy has been
booming for years in India. By making old currency notes invalid, people
holding on to stacks of cash have no choice but to deposit or exchange it in a
bank which means, it will be caught.
Unfortunately,
our citizens are smarter when it comes to money and hiding the taxable income. People
used their relatives accounts, hawala brokers who in-turn used proxies to
deposit large amounts as smaller values into different accounts, bank officials
helped the rich & powerful and in the end nearly 99% of the demonetized notes
found their way back into the Banks.
The government
hasn’t released accurate statistics on how many suspicious transactions have been
taken up for investigation or the quantum of black money that was unearthed. Until
these figures are made public, I would consider this argument as a only Partially
True
Argument 2:
It has prevented the growth of Black Money - Invalid
By cancelling
old denominations, and re-introducing new ones, there was only a temporary jolt
to the growth of black money. Once people get their hands on the new currency
notes (supply of new currency notes has pretty much normalized across the country)
they will continue to resort to going back to their old ways.
Citing Demonetization
as something that would prevent the growth of black money is like giving
Amrutanjan to a guy suffering from Migraine and telling him that this is the
permanent cure for his ailment. It is merely a temporary relief and not a
permanent cure.
In fact, I would
actually call this an Invalid argument that doesn’t require a True or False
comment.
Argument 3:
It has expanded the tax payer base - Partially True
This is yet
another legit explanation or argument. Cash, when deposited into a bank account
effectively starts a paper-trail for the tax man to start looking into. Any
individual who can deposit 1 or 2 lakhs into their bank account should have had
some income sources. By reviewing these suspect transactions, the government
effectively would expand the tax payer base (when done right of course).
As mentioned
in argument 1 until the statistics are released by the government on exactly
how many new tax payers were identified, I would consider this argument too as
partially true at best.
Note: The
messages circulated make claims about potentially 2.9 lakh crores worth of
money being investigated by the government and make hypotheticals to say, even
if 50% of this is black money, government will get X crores as tax revenue. Until
the statistics are actually released by the Government of India, I would take
these news sharing’s with a pinch of salt and consider them as only partially
true.
Argument 4:
It has brought down the volume of high
denomination currency notes - False
Similar to
argument 2, this one too is an invalid argument. The government has introduced
2000 rupee notes instead of old 500 and 1000 denominations. So, instead of
carrying 1 lakh in their pocket with 100 notes of 1000 each, a guy wishing to
conceal cash can now carry 2 lakhs with 100 notes of 2000 each. Until these
2000’s are phased out (not sure when) this argument doesn’t hold true. So, am
not going into the true or false point
Argument 5:
It has infused cash from the parallel economy into the banking system - True
This is
really and truly a success for the Demonetization exercise. Because of the
exercise, banks in India got a real massive influx of deposits which was very beneficial
for them. Even in my prior article on the detailed impact of demonetization I
had mentioned that this move will result in a positive outlook for banks. So,
this one is definitely a True
Argument 6:
It has brought down interest rates - True
As with the
cash influx for banks, in my prior article on detailed impact ofdemonetization, I had mentioned that this move will result in interest rates
going down – which has actually happened. So, this one too is definitely a True.
Argument 7:
It has increased household savings - False
As with
arguments 2 & 4, I would consider this an invalid argument. This is merely
a feel-good point added to a message to give the reader a sense of
satisfaction. Money got deposited into a bank account and was then most likely withdrawn
or spent. How can a move that invalidates a currency denomination result in
increased household savings? This one is definitely False
Argument 8:
It has crashed the rising land prices and made housing affordable - False
The indian
real estate had grown at an unsustainable pace from the year 2000 onwards and
had already hit a plateau by early 2016. An excess supply and refusal by
builder to cut their profits resulted in a situation where demand was slowing and
prices did not go up. It was more like a flat line maybe trending lower.
Demonetization
did not result in a drastic reduction in housing prices and in fact the prices
are pretty much where they were in 2016 prior to demonetization. So, this
argument is False.
Argument 9:
Has facilitated the growth of real economy by bringing in the shadow economy
into its fold - False
If
Demonetization did in fact bring in the shadow economy which was suspected to
be a good % of our GDP, the GDP growth figures over the last 3 quarters should’ve
seen an upward trend. Unfortunately the trend has been negative. Even in my
earlier article on the impact of demonetization on Economy & GDP, I had
mentioned that there will only be a short-term negative impact and things
should improve in the long run but I was unaware of the impending surprises
like GST which further impacted the recovery process.
So for now,
this argument is very much False. Until GDP growth statistics show a positive
movement, believing this argument is just impossible
Argument
10: It has eliminated fake currency and curb terror funding - False
Again, this
was a one time True point but not a permanent solution. Fake racketeers will
continue to figure out ways to produce fake currency notes no matter how many
times the government demonetizes notes. So, this argument is false because
terrorist activities still happen along our border and various parts of the country.
Final
Tally:
The Final
tally of the arguments is as follows:
- False: 4
- True: 2
- Partially True: 2
- Invalid: 2
Only 2 of
the 10 arguments are True with 2 more being Partially True. The rest are either
False or Invalid. Not to mention the months of inconvenience to the citizens or the approx 5000 crores that was actually spent in printing these new notes and bringing them into circulation.
So, for
now, I wouldn’t consider Demonetization a Success. Infact, the falling GDP
growth, reduced industrial and agricultural output is a clear indication that
decisions like this have significantly impacted our economy.
Sir what about the argument that usage of digital money has increased bcoz of demonetisation...
ReplyDeleteThat is very much true but was increasing in the past 5 years even before demonetisation. With youngsters becoming more tech savvy, cashless transactions were on the rise anyways and could've been encouraged even without demonetisation.
Delete