One of the main
points of contention for the Brits which urged them to vote in favor of the
Brexit was the fact that, many believed that the UK was financially supporting
the EU and that it would be better if the UK could spend that within its
borders rather than supporting other poorer nations in the EU.
In this section,
we examine the probable impact of Brexit on Britain’s public finances. First,
we look at Britain’s current contributions to the European Union. Second, we will
look at Britain’s likely fiscal relationship with the European Union after
Brexit.
The United Kingdom’s Current Contributions
to the European Union
As the EU has no
direct income of its own, every member state makes a standard contribution to
the EU’s budget based on the size of its Economy. They also share a % of the
Added Tax receipts with the EU. For the years 2014/15 the UK had supposedly
paid a Standard contribution of £13.7 billion plus £2.3 billion as part of the
tax receipts sharing. That works out to a total of about 16 billion Pounds and
has been one of the main selling points by those in favor of Brexit.
Of course, this
movement of money isn’t just one way traffic. It received back £4.8 billion
through the British Rebate and also a £0.8 billion fee for collecting customs duties
on behalf of the EU. So, after accounting for the receipts or incoming funds
the overall amount that UK contributed to the EU stands at around £10 billion.
We also need to
consider the fact that the EU disburses £4.4 billion to British companies and
households via various grants. Though the UK is indirectly getting a big chunk
of this 10 billion pounds back, the amount set aside in public funds in the
UK’s budget still stands at 10 billion pounds.
Britain’s financial relationship with
the European Union post-Brexit
At the outset, it looks like the Brexit is going to have a
direct savings in the order of around £10 billion a year which is approximately
14% of the public sectors net borrowing figure of £70 billion. As the British
Economy grows, this yearly contribution is only expected to rise which means,
there could be a lot of potential for savings if the coming years.
Of course, this assumes that the UK still receives its
rebate and its share of the customs duty. The rebate was agreed in the year
1984 when Britain was one of the poorer members of the EU which isn’t the case
now. So, if the UK stays a member of the EU, this rebate could potentially be
under risk in the next seven-year budget by the EU. If we take out the rebate
which stands at over £4 billion pounds, the net savings from the UK’s public
budget will be even higher.
Am sure you are thinking, savings of over £14 billion
pounds, that's a ton of public money that could be used by the UK to make the
lives of its own citizens better isn’t it?
We need to remember that, it wouldn't be this straight
forward.
Firstly, by leaving the EU, UK will no longer have free
access to the EU Market. Let’s take the case of Norway as an example. Though
Norway is not a direct member of the EU, it pays a contribution based on the
size of its economy in return to free access to the European Economic Area. It
is quite possible that the UK may take this route and hence not all of this 14
billion pounds may get saved. Experts predict that a Norway-style arrangement
could result in the UK paying at least 50-60% of what it is paying now. You may
ask why pay 50-60% if they are no longer part of the EU. That is because the EU
nations may not be in a forgiving mood and might want to make an example out of
the UK in order to detract other EU members from following suite and requesting
an Exit.
Secondly,
if the UK left the European Economic Area, it might need to compensate its
local exports if no free trade agreement were reached and the EU imposed its
common external tariff. The government may also need to compensate local
businesses for loss of access to EU Structural Funds such as the European
Regional Development Fund. These would be small amounts but nonetheless need to
be provisioned in the public funds budget.
In our
prior calculations we had included a £0.8 billion in duties as revenue which
may not be a revenue source post Brexit. In order to retain its free-trading
arrangements with EU nations, the UK may have to negotiate on very low or even
zero duty arrangements with its neighbors which means the revenues on the
public finances side is going to take a hit.
The UK is one of
the high tax countries and has over 3 million immigrants (with hundreds of
thousands joining the job market every year). Brexit could potentially cause a
decent sized dent in Tax revenue if stricter immigration policies are put in
place or if immigrants are forced to leave the country.
£ savings from Brexit – True or
False?
At the outset it
looked like the British government could save about £10bn per year (or more) on
its contributions to the European Union’s budget if the country left the EU.
However, the reality
is that the actual savings will be much lower than £10bn because there are a
number of factors that could reduce them. The government might have to continue
to make some contributions to the Union if it wanted to preserve single market
access, it might need to compensate sectors of the economy and specific regions
that currently benefit from European Union handouts and it may have to
sacrifice customs duties income to strike new trade deals with countries
outside Europe.
So, to answer the
final question – Yes, this Brexit will Definitely benefit the Public Finances
but not to the level the proponents of Brexit had projected. Only time will
tell if this public finance saving is worth the risk of leaving the EU.
Disclaimer: All views presented in this article are those of the Author and are not endorsed by anyone. While every effort has been made to ensure that the data quoted and used in this article is reliable, there is no guarantee that it is correct, and the Author accepts no liability whatsoever in respect of any errors or omissions. This article is only economic research and is not intended to constitute investment advice, nor to solicit dealing in securities or investments.
No comments:
Post a Comment